The Carbon Footprint of Media Institutes in the Age of the Climate Crisis

Abstract

This article provides a concise overview of the carbon footprint of media institutes and the imperative need for sustainable practices in an era dominated by the climate crisis. Media institutions play a significant role in shaping public opinion and behavior, and their environmental impact is becoming increasingly pertinent. This research investigates the various dimensions of carbon emissions associated with media institutes, encompassing energy consumption, transportation, infrastructure, and waste management. It also examines the integration of sustainability into curriculum and operational practices. The primary goal of this research is to look at various insights from the historical literature that can help with the adoption of sustainable development in media institutes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) with an eighteen-year time range (2007 to 2024) is being considered to study various insights and gaps in the sustainable journey in a media institute.
The study emphasizes the importance of implementing eco-conscious strategies to mitigate carbon emissions, reduce energy consumption, and promote sustainable behaviours within media institutes. By analyzing case studies and best practices, this research offers actionable insights for institutions seeking to minimize their carbon footprint and contribute to climate change mitigation. Ultimately, the findings highlight the critical role that media institutes can play in fostering awareness and action toward environmental sustainability in an age marked by climate crisis challenges.
References
• Adam, M. (1975). The Image of Climate Crisis in Media: A Conceptual Metaphor Analysis. 5691.
• Batmunkh, A. (2022). Carbon Footprint of The Most Popular Social Media Platforms.
• Bekaroo, G., Bokhoree, C., Ramsamy, P., & Moedeen, W. (2018). SC. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.238
• Berners-Lee, M., Howard, D. C., Moss, J., Kaivanto, K., & Scott, W. A. (2011). Science of the Total Environment Greenhouse gas footprinting for small businesses — The use of input–output data. Science of the Total Environment, 409(5), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.023
• Chodkowska, J., Tomasz, M., & Krzysztof, S. (2023). Exploring role of media in shaping low-carbon economy in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(9), 9543–9565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02446-9
• Crisis, C., & Framework, T. M. (2022). İklim Krizine Türk Medyası Çerçevesinden Bakmak. 33, 97–112.
• Edwardsson, M. P. (2012). Media processes for content production: Studies of structures and climate impacts.
• Foxwell-Norton, K. (2009). The global alternative and community media sector: Prospects in an era of climate crisis.
• Gao, P. X. (2013). SPOT: A Smart Personalized Office Thermal Control System. 237–246.
• Gupta, P. (2022). Role of Media and Indigenous Communities to Combat Climate Change. 11(05), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.7753/IJSEA1105.1001
• Jahnke, K., Fendt, C., Fouesneau, M., Georgiev, I., Herbst, T., Kaasinen, M., Kossakowski, D., Rybizki, J., Schlecker, M., Seidel, G., Henning, T., & Kreidberg, L. (2020). An astronomical institute’s perspective on meeting the challenges of the climate crisis. 4(September).
• Kaul, V. (n.d.). Environmental Crisis and the Role of Media. 1(4), 684–697.
• Loll, L., Lonski, L. Von, Cremer, L. D., & Richter, M. H. (2023). The influence of climate crisis-related media reporting on the eco-anxiety of individuals. 19(2).
• Marks, L. U., Clark, J., Livingston, J., Oleksijczuk, D., Hilderbrand, L., & Marks, L. U. (2020). Streaming Media’s Environmental Impact. Media + Environment Blog.
• Martin, P., Brau-nogu, S., Coriat, M., Garnier, P., Hughes, A., & Tibaldo, L. (2022). The carbon footprint of IRAP. April, 1–42.
• Maxwell, R. (2014). Media Industries and the Ecological Crisis. 2, 2–5.
• Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2012). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
• Oruma, S. O., Misra, S., & Fernandez-Sanz, L. (2021). Agriculture 4.0: An Implementation Framework for Food Security Attainment in Nigeria’s Post-Covid-19 Era. IEEE Access, 9, 83592–83627. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086453
• Pahlevan-Sharif, S., Mura, P., & Wijesinghe, S. N. R. (2019). A systematic review of systematic reviews in tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39(April), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001
• Pahlevan Sharif, S., Mura, P., & Wijesinghe, S. N. R. (2019). Systematic Reviews in Asia: Introducing the “PRISMA” Protocol to Tourism and Hospitality Scholars. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2463-5_2
• Ridanpää, J. (2022). ‘Carbon footprint nationalism’: Re-conceptualizing Finnish nationalism and national pride through climate change discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2021.1937974
• Robinson, O. J., Tewkesbury, A., Kemp, S., & Williams, I. D. (2018). Towards a universal carbon footprint standard: A case study of carbon management at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4435–4455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.147
• Tavares, A. O., Areia, N. P., Mellett, S., James, J., Intrigliolo, D. S., Couldrick, L. B., & Berthoumieu, J. (n.d.). The European Media Portrayal of Climate Change: Implications for the Social Mobilization towards Climate Action. 1–13.